IMPARGO's transportation and logistics glossary
Find the definitions of the most important terms used in transportation and logistics industry
Material flow is the physical movement of goods through a company and the chain around it: raw materials and bought-in parts coming in, work in progress moving between stages, finished stock going out. Every transport, handling, packing and storage step that carries an item to the next stage belongs to it.
The word flow is doing real work there. It treats material as a stream with a direction and a rate, not a pile of separate jobs, so the question it invites is where the stream slows down.
Internal material flow is everything inside the fence. Goods come off a vehicle, move to a storage location, are picked for production, travel between machines, and come back as finished output staged for dispatch.
External material flow is the part that runs between your suppliers, your own sites and your customers, most of it by road. It arrives as inbound logistics and leaves as outbound logistics. Between two plants of the same company the counterparty is you, and that movement is planned on its own, as an inter-plant transfer.
Strip any flow back and the same handful of operations repeat, in different orders and at different sizes.
Only one of those is meant to cover distance. The rest are handling and waiting, which is how a flow can look busy and still be slow.
Material flow has a shadow: the information flow that tells it what to do. Orders, releases, dispatch notes, receipts and status messages travel with the goods, and the two are checked against each other at every hand-over.
When they fall out of step, the goods are usually fine and the record is not. A pallet standing at a dock with no matching receipt is a material flow stopped for an information reason, and more forklifts do nothing for it.
A flow runs at the speed of its slowest step, not the average of its steps. Adding capacity anywhere else mostly builds a bigger queue in front of the same constraint.
The symptoms repeat on every site. Stock piles up ahead of one machine or one dock while stations behind it stand idle. Material is handled several times because it was put down somewhere temporary.
Each stop has a cost with a name. Material standing still is working capital. Handling it twice is labour. Floor space taken by a queue is space unavailable for anything else. Lead time that stretches is a delivery promise getting harder to keep.
Material flow analysis is the ordinary method: map the path a representative item actually takes, step by step, and record where it moves, where it waits, how far it travels and how often it is touched.
What the map exposes is usually distance nobody designed and handling nobody needed: a route that crosses itself, a storage location chosen because it was free rather than because it was near, a check repeated twice. Those are the cheap fixes, and they come before new equipment.
The improvements run along a few lines: shorten the path, cut how often material is set down and picked up again, level the pace of neighbouring steps, and let downstream demand pull material forward rather than pushing it on as soon as it is made.
For a dispatcher, material flow is mostly the external legs, and they behave differently. Inside the fence you can reorder work during the shift. On the road the leg is committed the moment the vehicle pulls out, and the flow downstream was built around the arrival time you gave it.
So the long legs between fixed points get planned first. A scheduled line haul between two sites is what the next step in the flow is sized for, so a leg outside that window leaves that step with nothing to work on.
Which makes transport a flow question, not only a price question. What the leg costs matters. What the flow needs to know is when the material lands, in what condition, and whether the next step can take it. Plan against those and the rest of the chain has something firm to work from.
© IMPARGO 2026, All rights reserved.